HHighbrowGroupBenchmark
Menu

Company-mineral profile

HP Inc.

Tantalum · Manufacturer

Method 0.4 · Release 11 · deployed September 13, 2026, 00:07 UTC (September 12, 8:07 p.m. ET)
Dataset last updated: September 12, 2026

← Back to benchmark
Mineral
Tantalum
Role
Manufacturer
Product niche
Electronic hardware (company-level)
Period
2025
Level
Company
Country
United States
Score
92
Band
A
Coverage
100%
Confidence
Moderate
Dataset source date
2025-12-31
Research review date
2026-09-03

Company-level 3TG disclosure; not a product, shipment, direct-supplier or facility-performance assessment.

Current issuer disclosure benchmark. Product mix differs within this initial cohort, and issuer-reported figures are not independently verified by Highbrow.

Named companies have not endorsed or participated in this research.

Release 11 records source and review dates once per profile, shown above. Method 0.5 will record them for each criterion.

Six criteria and their evidence

  1. Sourcing policy

    ✓ Supported

    The updated responsible-minerals policy and supplier expectations are described.

    Source:
    sec.gov ↗
    Page / section:
    Responsible Minerals Program; updated 2025 RMS Policy

  2. Accountable oversight

    ✓ Supported

    Program governance, supplier requirements and management processes are described.

    Source:
    sec.gov ↗
    Page / section:
    OECD Step 1, management and supplier engagement

  3. Upstream transparency

    ✓ Supported

    Potential facilities and origin categories are disclosed with an explicit warning that company-level CMRTs may over-report.

    Source:
    sec.gov ↗
    Page / section:
    RCOI; Results; Attachment A

  4. Assessment evidence

    ◐ Partial

    Facility assessment participation and results are reported, but the filing is not treated as an independent audit of HP's report.

    Source:
    sec.gov ↗
    Page / section:
    OECD Step 4; Facility Assessment Status

  5. Risk response

    ✓ Supported

    Escalation, supplier engagement, traceability checks and remediation are described.

    Source:
    sec.gov ↗
    Page / section:
    OECD Step 3; further mitigation

  6. Reporting & limitations

    ✓ Supported

    The annual filing states scope, quantitative results, limitations and planned improvements.

    Source:
    sec.gov ↗
    Page / section:
    Reporting period; Results; limitations

Issuer-reported metrics

  • Supplier response rate

    100% of more than 200 in-scope suppliers

    Issuer-reported 3TG-wide rate; not mineral-specific.

    sec.gov ↗ · Results — Supplier Engagement · As of 2025-12-31

  • Potential 3TG facilities

    231

    Supplier-reported potential facilities; HP says some may not have contributed to HP products.

    sec.gov ↗ · Results — Facility Assessment Status · As of 2025-12-31

  • Assessed, active or recycled-source facilities

    More than 99%

    Issuer combines multiple status categories; this is not a Highbrow conformance score.

    sec.gov ↗ · Results — Facility Assessment Status · As of 2025-12-31

  • Facilities that may source from covered countries

    23; all reported conformant or active during 2025

    Issuer-reported 3TG-wide result; active is not the same as conformant.

    sec.gov ↗ · Results — Due diligence results · As of 2025-12-31

Upstream relationships

No upstream relationship record is included for this profile.

A “reported possible upstream” relationship is not a “confirmed direct” relationship.

Report a correction

CMMS-BS assesses what public sourcing disclosures establish. It is not a certification, an audit or legal advice.